Masked PAN
Full PAN is not shown in sample reports.
Use PAN verification for employee, vendor, contractor, KYC, and payroll workflows with masked reporting and consent-first handling.
Full PAN is not shown in sample reports.
Reviewer sees match and mismatch signals.
PAN verification is not a borrowing or repayment assessment.
Choose PAN, state the reason for verification, and invite the subject or enter fixture data in sandbox.
The data principal sees the requester, purpose, and check type before any live verification starts.
PRAMAAN evaluates document signals and match evidence while keeping sensitive values minimized.
Teams receive a masked, timestamped result with consent reference, signals, and review guidance.
PAN is sensitive financial identity data. PRAMAAN frames it as a verification signal, not a financial-health score.
Checks whether the submitted value follows the expected PAN format.
Surfaces whether the name aligns with the configured verification source.
Can help distinguish individual and business PAN contexts where supported.
Included only where your configured workflow supports it.
Displays PAN as a masked reference such as ABC**1234* style redaction.
Invalid format, name mismatch, or entity mismatch are flagged for review.
PAN is often used wherever a person or business receives payment, but it should not be treated as proof of financial reliability.
Payroll and contractor onboarding
Vendor identity checks
KYC workflow support
Validate financial identity signals before payroll setup.
Compare vendor PAN details with business records.
Reduce manual back-and-forth on tax identity evidence.
Use as one signal in a broader consented verification stack.
PRAMAAN keeps PAN reporting bounded to verification signals and avoids claims about borrowing profile or repayment ability.
Every preview uses dummy sandbox data, a consent reference, a timestamp, document-specific signals, and bounded report language.
Sample sandbox report — no real PII
Sample sandbox report — no real PII. PAN is masked and does not indicate borrowing profile.
Format or source mismatch should block automation until reviewed.
Spelling, legal name, and entity-name differences need reviewer context.
Individual vs company PAN confusion is a common onboarding risk.
Start with a single live check or use sandbox fixture data before wiring PAN into onboarding.
Single live verification
₹99
Integrate PAN signals into HRIS, payroll, vendor management, or platform onboarding through hosted flows or APIs.
Household help, driver, tutor — the default identity rail in India.
Vendor onboarding, B2B contractor vetting, marketplace seller verification.
Large B2B contracts, marketplace KYB, investor diligence on prospective partners.
Drivers, delivery workers, fleet operators — DL is the implicit job-credential.
Most senior hires, mid-management vendors, NRIs returning.
Mid-to-senior hires, tutors, professional services contractors.
No. Live checks require explicit consent from the data principal before processing begins.
Yes. The sandbox demo uses fixture data only and does not require real PII.
PRAMAAN surfaces the mismatch as a verification signal and recommends manual review where the evidence is incomplete, stale, or inconsistent.
No. Reports provide verification signals and consent evidence for reviewer decision support. They should not be treated as a guaranteed legal outcome.
No. It provides identity and tax identifier signals only.
No. PAN is masked in previews and should remain minimized in reviewer surfaces.
Use sandbox fixture data first, then run a live ₹99 verification when the requester, purpose, and consent path are ready.