Skip to content
PramaanDPDP Live
High-sensitivity background documentConsent requiredSandbox fixture data

Verify PCC document signals with high-sensitivity handling.

Review Police Clearance Certificate document signals, issuer/date consistency, and consent evidence without claiming direct police-source access or criminal-history conclusions.

Sensitivity
High
Output
Certificate signal
Consent
Explicit
Review
Recommended

High-sensitivity handling

Purpose limitation and minimal disclosure are central.

Certificate signal

Focuses on PCC document evidence and consistency.

No direct-source claim

Does not claim direct police-source verification unless configured.

How verification works

A consent-first path from request to reviewable result.

1

Create a purpose-led request

Choose PCC, state the reason for verification, and invite the subject or enter fixture data in sandbox.

2

Capture explicit consent

The data principal sees the requester, purpose, and check type before any live verification starts.

3

Run the verification rail

PRAMAAN evaluates document signals and match evidence while keeping sensitive values minimized.

4

Review the report

Teams receive a masked, timestamped result with consent reference, signals, and review guidance.

What PRAMAAN checks

PCC signals built for reviewer decision support.

PCC verification must be handled carefully because it can influence background-related decisions.

Certificate number extraction

Extracts the visible PCC or certificate reference where present.

Issuing authority

Surfaces issuer, jurisdiction, or authority text for review.

Candidate name

Compares candidate identity fields with submitted profile context.

Issue date and validity

Flags old, expired, or unclear certificate timing.

Authenticity signals

Looks for document consistency, formatting, and tamper indicators.

Manual review pathway

Issuer mismatch, old certificate, or unclear language should be reviewed by a person.

Why this document matters

Why PCC needs extra caution

PCC documents can affect access, employment, and deployment decisions. Reports should stay limited to what the certificate supports.

High-sensitivity background workflow

Minimal disclosure

Manual review for ambiguous cases

Use cases

Designed for individuals, operations teams, and enterprise reviewers.

Employment onboarding

Support background-document review for relevant roles.

International hiring

Organize certificate evidence for cross-border employment contexts.

Security-sensitive roles

Route certificate signals through careful review.

Domestic worker verification

Use explicit consent and minimal disclosure for home-access roles.

Facility staff verification

Attach certificate evidence to site-access files.

Contractor deployment

Review PCC timing and issuer consistency before deployment.

Consent and DPDP guardrails

High-sensitivity background document handling

PCC workflows should require explicit consent, purpose limitation, minimal disclosure, audit trails, and manual review where needed.

Explicit consent required

Purpose limitation

Minimal disclosure

Audit-ready trail

Manual review where needed

Sample report preview

Masked, specific, and designed for human review.

Every preview uses dummy sandbox data, a consent reference, a timestamp, document-specific signals, and bounded report language.

Sample sandbox report — no real PII

PCC document signal

Manual review recommended
Document reference
PCC-DEMO-****-2048
Consent reference
CNS-PCC-DEMO-2048
Timestamp
24 May 2026, 11:14 IST
Certificate numberExtracted
Issuing authorityReturned for review
Issue dateWithin fixture window
Sensitivity noteMinimal disclosure

Sample sandbox report — no real PII. PCC verification provides certificate signals and does not claim direct police-source clearance.

Risk and limitation signals

Clear flags for what needs review.

Expired or old PCC

Old certificates may not reflect current context and should be reviewed.

Issuer mismatch

Unexpected authority, jurisdiction, or formatting needs manual review.

Tampered certificate

Edited or inconsistent certificate imagery should not be auto-approved.

Pricing and CTA

Run one consented PCC document review.

Use PCC verification as a high-sensitivity document workflow with manual-review guidance.

Single live verification

₹99

PCC
  • Certificate extraction
  • Issuer/date consistency
  • Minimal disclosure
  • Manual-review note
Enterprise and API

PCC workflows for sensitive workforce decisions

Integrate certificate-signal review into HR, facility, contractor, and background-document queues.

Purpose limitation

Audit export

Role-based review

Sensitive-data handling

Related verification documents

Combine this check with the right adjacent signals.

Explore all checks
FAQ

Police Clearance Certificate verification questions.

Can PRAMAAN run a PCC check without consent?

No. Live checks require explicit consent from the data principal before processing begins.

Can I test this without real personal data?

Yes. The sandbox demo uses fixture data only and does not require real PII.

What happens on a mismatch?

PRAMAAN surfaces the mismatch as a verification signal and recommends manual review where the evidence is incomplete, stale, or inconsistent.

Is the report a legal conclusion?

No. Reports provide verification signals and consent evidence for reviewer decision support. They should not be treated as a guaranteed legal outcome.

Does this query a police source directly?

No. This page frames PCC verification as document and certificate-signal review unless a direct-source workflow is explicitly configured.

Does PRAMAAN say someone has no criminal record?

No. PRAMAAN should only surface what the certificate and configured workflow support, with manual review for sensitive decisions.

Consent-first verification

Start a PCC verification with PRAMAAN.

Use sandbox fixture data first, then run a live ₹99 verification when the requester, purpose, and consent path are ready.