Consent-first verification
No rental agreement check runs without explicit consent.
PRAMAAN verifies registered or notarised rental agreements using document OCR, notary and date consistency checks, address extraction, and consent-first workflows designed for Indian verification teams.
No rental agreement check runs without explicit consent.
Extracts parties, address, dates, rent, and tenure signals.
Checks notary, registration, and agreement date consistency signals.
Surfaces the residence address for reviewer comparison.
Links the result to purpose, consent reference, and timestamp.
Demo mode uses fixture data only. No real PII is processed.
The page now explains the complete journey: initiation, explicit consent, document intelligence, and a report that separates signals from reviewer decisions.
Requester starts a Rental Agreement verification from a clear purpose and uploads the agreement or sends a hosted flow.
The data principal receives a consent request, reviews what will be checked, and approves before processing.
OCR and document checks extract parties, address, dates, rent, tenure, and notary or registration signals.
The result includes confidence, risk indicators, consent reference, timestamp, and manual review notes where needed.
PRAMAAN should help teams understand what the document says, where confidence is strong, and where a reviewer needs to slow down.
Extracts the landlord or lessor name and surfaces low-confidence text for review.
Extracts the tenant or lessee name and helps compare it with the consented subject.
Parses the address block so reviewers can compare it with declared residence.
Checks tenure, validity window, and date readability from the document.
Extracts monthly rent, deposit references where visible, and rental period signals.
Highlights stamp presence, readability, and date consistency where applicable.
Flags date mismatches or unusual sequencing for reviewer attention.
Surfaces signals that may indicate stale, inconsistent, or backdated paperwork.
Highlights ownership, tenant, and sub-tenant chain clues where present in the document.
Marks blur, crop, glare, missing pages, or weak extraction as review required.
Connects the result to consent purpose, timestamp, requester, and audit reference.
Rental agreements are not a magic answer. They are useful because they can carry the current residence context that many onboarding teams actually need.
Rental agreements are commonly used as address proof across tenant, employee, vendor, and society workflows.
They can help when Aadhaar, PAN, or another ID carries an old address or no usable current residence signal.
Structured verification reduces ambiguity around parties, address, tenure, dates, and document quality.
Risk indicators help teams spot mismatch, stale paperwork, informal sub-let chains, or possible backdating signals.
Each buyer sees the same underlying verification evidence, but the decision context changes by workflow.
Verify tenant-provided rental agreement signals before onboarding or handover.
Validate resident or tenant address documents with a consent-first workflow.
Support employee address verification during onboarding or compliance review.
Verify contractor residence proof before deployment to client locations.
Check address proof for vendors, freelancers, and service providers.
Support address verification workflows for high-trust users or sellers.
PRAMAAN positions rental agreement verification as a consent-first workflow: purpose shown, consent captured, consent logged, and the document check initiated only after approval.
No rental agreement check runs without explicit consent from the data principal.
The subject receives a consent request with the requester, purpose, and document type.
Consent is logged with a reference, timestamp, and purpose before verification starts.
The check runs only after consent is captured.
Sandbox demo mode uses fixture data only and does not process real PII.
Audit-ready consent evidence supports compliant verification workflows.
The report preview shows the decision structure buyers expect: extracted fields, confidence, risk flags, consent reference, and reviewer notes.
Sample sandbox report — no real PII
Signals are evidence for review, not final legal conclusions.
PRAMAAN should communicate verification signals in plain language so teams know when to proceed, review, or request a better document.
Registered or notarised agreement, clear OCR, valid tenure, address extracted cleanly, and readable date signals.
Unregistered agreement, sub-let chain, weak OCR, old date, address mismatch, or missing supporting context.
Date inconsistency, suspected tampering, missing parties, unreadable stamp, or document quality too poor to review confidently.
These are verification and review signals. They should not be presented as final legal conclusions or government certification.
Designed for self-serve buyers and evaluation teams: ₹99 entry price, UPI checkout path, sandbox demo, and report language suitable for review workflows.
Rental Agreement verification
₹99
Technical teams can evaluate the sandbox, API docs, webhook patterns, and consent-reference model before moving live verification into production workflows.
Evaluate consented verification creation and result retrieval in PRAMAAN developer docs.
Test report shape, consent references, and fixture responses before live processing.
Review webhook documentation for event delivery patterns and integration planning.
Design integrations around purpose, consent reference, status, and evidence fields.
Short, legally careful answers for buyers, operators, and compliance teams.
Yes. PRAMAAN can extract and evaluate document signals from an unregistered agreement, but the report should mark confidence and review needs carefully.
Use a more relevant address proof such as a property tax receipt, sale deed, utility bill, or another supported document where available.
PRAMAAN can highlight chain-of-possession signals where the document shows owner, tenant, and sub-tenant context. Reviewers should confirm the relationship before relying on it.
PRAMAAN flags date inconsistency, stale tenure, notary or registration date mismatch, and document quality signals. These are review signals, not legal conclusions.
Yes. No rental agreement verification runs until the data principal gives explicit consent, and the consent event is logged.
No. Sandbox mode uses fixture data only, so buyers and developers can evaluate the workflow without real personal data.
End-to-end PRAMAAN verification usually returns in under 2 minutes where the supported check can complete normally.
Yes. Employers can use rental agreement verification as a consent-first address proof workflow during onboarding or review.
Yes. Housing societies and RWAs can use it to validate tenant or resident address documents with explicit consent.
The report should mark the extraction as low confidence and route the document for manual review or request a clearer upload.
Identity and address proof signal for Indian residents.
Tax identity signal for tenants, vendors, and paid workers.
Fallback identity and registered address signal.
Identity, DOB, and address-bearing document signal.
Strong identity and travel document verification signal.
Business identity signal for vendor and marketplace onboarding.
Start with a sandbox demo or run a ₹99 verification when the subject is ready to consent.